<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lighttpd vs Nginx (Apache Benchmark)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twilightseo.fallenray.com/server/lighttpd-vs-nginx-apache-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twilightseo.fallenray.com/server/lighttpd-vs-nginx-apache-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Standing at the border line. Beautiful color spectrum of Search Engine Optimization. White, Gray, Black Hat SEO learning by doing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ruru</title>
		<link>http://twilightseo.fallenray.com/server/lighttpd-vs-nginx-apache-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>ruru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rainbowhatseo.fallenray.com/?p=79#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thanks. It's true. Not much difference in performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. It&#8217;s true. Not much difference in performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton</title>
		<link>http://twilightseo.fallenray.com/server/lighttpd-vs-nginx-apache-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rainbowhatseo.fallenray.com/?p=79#comment-24</guid>
		<description>nginx has more handy config file syntax than lighttpd (nginx config is more easy to maintain). Preformance difference is insignificant, and choice between nginx and lighttpd should be done based on features, not performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nginx has more handy config file syntax than lighttpd (nginx config is more easy to maintain). Preformance difference is insignificant, and choice between nginx and lighttpd should be done based on features, not performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
